Yes.
Both are very reliable, but Honda a bit more. Not noticeable.
New Pilot has a more boxy design, which means more space inside. More trunk space, more compartments, more room to be comfortable.
It also has the weaker, more fuel efficient engine so the Toyota is a little faster. Again not noticeable. Gas mileages are still similar, but Honda better.They are both fine cars..I would say that a 2009 Toyota Highlander is better because my father has one and it works better than a Honda pilot.Pilot: Seating for 8
Larger Size
Boxy
Highlander: Gets better mileage on the Highway
Smaller Size
Looks better than Pilot (IMO)
More Horsepowerboth get better gas mileage than the tahoe and expedition. both get worse gas mileage than the chevy traverse or ford flex.
no though, the highlander is better. better drive, better ride, better look.hell no toyota is alot better and as for the guy on top saying they get worst gas mileage then a gm id like to see his stats,if you drive properly with no unneeded load the gas will last forever on the toyota,there's a reason why gm is begging for help while toyota keeps going up,as for the honda,ive had Toyota's and Honda's in my life and i find honda puts too much things in there cars that aren't needed so more to brake,stick with toyotaboth get worse miles per gallon than the 2009 chevy tahoe and 2009 ford expedition, #If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |
|
March 11th, 2010 | fanhou.com | edit
